• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

    Atomic Dog

    Angry Poodle Barbecue


    Thursday, September 18, 2008
    By Nick Welsh (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    READ ’n’ WEEP: After sustaining no less than seven flat bicycle tires in 10 days, my first inclination, naturally, was to blame City Hall. I figured the city’s street sweeping program — for which we pay $1 million a year via increased parking tickets — must have utterly collapsed. Why else would the city’s bike lanes be choked with so much broken glass? I came to learn, however, that the street sweepers had not slacked off at all; frequency of service has remained steady while the number of miles swept has increased. By the time I discovered this, I’d become so bedeviled by my flats that I was looking to hire an exorcist. Had I been reading the News-Press at the time, however, I would have known the source of all my pneumatic leakage: the Teamsters.

    Angry Poodle

    In recent weeks, the News-Press has been running about five full-page, color ads sort of denouncing the Teamsters Union — which was elected to represent News-Press newsroom employees at the bargaining table two years ago by a 33-6 vote — for various and nefarious misdeeds. Among the almost-allegations leveled by the News-Press against the Teamsters was the slashing of tires involving the cars of six News-Press employees. I say “sort of” and “almost” because the ads, no doubt vetted by a very competent attorney, took pains to never actually accuse the Teamsters of these acts. Instead, the ads strategically noted that tires had been flattened, and exhorted readers to “Let the Teamsters know that Santa Barbara will not tolerate these tactics.”

    More than anything, these ads indicate that the bees under the bonnet of News-Press owner Wendy McCaw are buzzing again. And that’s rarely a good sign. Arousing the wrath of Wendy is the Teamsters’ latest effort to get McCaw to negotiate a contract in good faith. Earlier this summer, McCaw gave over a considerable chunk of space to run an op-ed comparing the Teamsters’ tactics in Santa Barbara to the Nazis back in Germany. If that comparison seems a bit unhinged, it could be that McCaw was feeling stressed. About the same time, the General Counsel for the National Labor Relations Board announced it would be filing charges against McCaw and the News-Press for their bad faith at the bargaining table. That’s a serious accomplishment. It takes a lot to get the NLRB — hardly a bastion of bolshevism or a hotbed of proletarian proclivities — to jump in this way.

    At the same time, the Teamsters have begun quietly dispatching small squads of organizers to various businesses asking them to discontinue advertising in the News-Press until the News-Press begins bargaining in good faith. The Teamsters are so touchingly naïve. As if loss of money has ever affected McCaw. If it did, she might have made some effort to reverse the dramatic loss of confidence — that’s cost the News-Press an estimated loss of 10,000-12,000 readers in the past two years — now felt by so many in the community for their daily paper. Beginning late July, the Teamsters started passing out leaflets to customers of the businesses that have declined to stop advertising, asking the customers to ask the owners to discontinue advertising. In addition, the Teamsters are asking customers not to patronize those businesses who keep advertising with McCaw.

    Frankly, I think the Teamsters seriously goofed by not announcing this campaign to the broader Santa Barbara community. This silence has allowed McCaw to frame the issue in her own terms. It has also caught many union sympathizers and supporters of News-Press employees off-guard. To the extent the Teamsters have any prayer of success, community support will be absolutely essential. While many Santa Barbarans are indifferent — if not actively hostile — to labor unions in general, they have come to seriously miss having a daily they can rely upon for obits, sports, and some modest semblance of news. Instead, they now have a daily that’s embraced and embodied all the one-sided nastiness common to the blogs. Ironically, bloggers are rushing in to fill the mainstream void and conducting themselves with relative restraint.

    Push came to shove last week when Teamster organizer John Peralta filed a police report claiming he’d been struck while passing out leaflets in front of the Home Improvement Center by an angry customer. Peralta claimed the man called him “an ugly faggot,” adding, “I wish you would die,” and then struck him in the chest with “a reverse karate chop.” He acknowledged the man may have hit him accidentally while trying to grab Peralta’s leaflets. Peralta had a fellow Teamster organizer — and witness — call the cops; so too did the agitated customer. By the time the cops arrived 50 minutes later, the man had left. Based on the eye-witness testimony of a store employee who disputed any assault occurred, the police remain skeptical of Peralta’s claim. For his part, Peralta remains suspicious that the whole thing was a setup engineered to make him loose his cool so that he could be tarred as the classic “Teamster goon.”

    In the next few weeks, there should be a whole lot of action all at once on the News-Press front. Next week, in Orange County, a judge will be asked to rule whether McCaw, a multimillionaire many times over, abused the court system by suing the writer of an American Journalism Review article critical of the News-Press. The writer countersued McCaw, claiming Wendy is trying to silence and intimidate critics from speaking their mind by dragging them through the courts, a trip most people simply cannot afford. Given that all 33 of McCaw’s specific allegations of libel against the writer have been rejected by various judges, things are looking grim for McCaw but good for the 1st Amendment. In addition, a ruling should be out any second now in the dispute between former editor Jerry Roberts, over breach of contract and journalistic ethics: she sued him for $500,000, he counter-sued, and then she counter-counter-sued for the amount of $25 million. Finally, the documentary, Citizen McCaw, will be screened again next month at the Fiesta Five as well as on PBS — unchanged — despite demands made to do so by McCaw’s hard-chomping legal team.

    What actual good any of this will do remains unclear. McCaw may lose and lose and lose, but her ability to appeal appears as unlimited as her bank account. In the meantime, my flat tires have miraculously ceased, for which I credit divine intervention. But if I were the Teamsters, I’d get on the phone and call an exorcist.

    Related Links

    • More Angry Poodle columns

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    So why was the guy even at Home Improvement?

    azuresees (anonymous profile)
    September 18, 2008 at 6:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Well, well, well. I stopped my News-Press subscription quite some time ago. However, I am reminded of the fact that the unions are big business. I am also reminded of the fact that every time the teamsters go "active", it's always with different groups of union members at different times. Sometimes the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, thus over-kill. Sometimes, the less kill, the better, methinks.
    Absence of malice is something journalists use strongly, and so do lawyers. So you shouldn't be too surprised that McCaw's lawyers use it too. It's in the wording, not the content.
    I didn't understand before, Nick, that this column is your personal opinion and not a news column. My mistake. If it were a news column, you would not be writing so many of them before you did all of your research. Not that I don't enjoy it when you catch someone with their pants down. It just seems a little sketchy sometimes.

    jomo (anonymous profile)
    September 18, 2008 at 10:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Looks like Nick took the opportunity to bash McCaw instead of pointing out that the Teamsters actions to encourage a secondary boycott are illegal. Teamster executive, business executive - not much difference - all in it for themselves...The unions were a positive force, about 70 years ago.....

    RCMeltzer (anonymous profile)
    September 18, 2008 at 2:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    RC, you are wrong about the law, as is the News-Press. The News-Press can lie and mischaracterize what the Teamsters are and are not doing with some degree of impunity because, as its lawyers no doubt school it, of the wide berth available to it because of the First Amendment and the California equivalent. Fortunately, notwithstanding the delusions and wishes of Wendy and her lawyers, those same constitutional protections apply not only to the media or corporate employers, but to unions, too. The United States Supreme Court and the California Supreme Court, as well as the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, have all pronounced handbilling of advertisers and customers of labor disputants of this very sort to be lawful activity, and that any attempt to regulate it would raise serious constitutional concerns. McCaw and her lawyer mob have a tendency to declare anything and everything that her adversaries do illegal, debased and/or otherwise subject to sanction. They do that by creating and then shouting about the parallel non-existent world that she claims her adversaries inhabit, and by perceiving a wrong and tying their desired perpetrator to it, facts be damned; if we're going to make Nazi comparisons, Hermann Goering comes to mind. This is proven time and again by Wendy's legal losses. They don't lose just because they're wrong; they lose because their lying and exaggerations are exposed as such, and because whatever tribunals they appear before recognize the tactic, wait for facts to support the off-the-wall accusations, and they never come.

    JoeHill (anonymous profile)
    September 18, 2008 at 8:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Binky: If you're out there, I need a ruling: Does the reference to Nazis even though the name "Hitler" wasn't mentioned constitute Godwin's Law?

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    September 23, 2008 at 10:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    The way I interpret it, yes!

    Mrs. McCaw started it!

    Ergo, the News-Press is officially over!

    binky (anonymous profile)
    September 23, 2008 at 11:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    The good news: McCaw's losing streak in the courts has restarted. Couldn't happen to a more deserving person.

    The bad news: The innocent will pay. McCaw's history is stuffed with examples of her lashing out, indiscriminately, when faced with defeat. She just lost -- all hail the First Amendment! -- her libel suit against Susan Paterno and will be forced to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in Paterno's legal bills. And she could well lose soon in her legal jihad against Jerry Roberts. Again, that's great, but we're probably looking at more punitive layoffs at the NP, and McCaw's shown that she'll probably just fire the most competent people left -- what few there are.

    It's an insane cycle -- lash out, lose, lash out -- but one all too familiar in Wendyland. God, this woman is a cancer.

    MrMoreno (anonymous profile)
    September 27, 2008 at 9:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Mist
    Temperature:
    50.0°
    Wind:
    3 N

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Best Of 2008
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Blue Green Guide 2008
    • Wedding Guide 2008
    • SBIFF 2008 All Access
    • 2008 Election Coverage
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
    • Made in Santa Barbara
    • California’s Great Olive Oil Flood
    • Santa Barbara’s Alpine Connection
    • Supes Begin 2009 by Tackling Greka Oil Spills
    • Hey Bush, Read This
    • The Meat Puppets Return with a New Record, Bright Future
    • Enjoy Year-Round Fun with the Santa Barbara Ski and Sports Club, Founded in 1955
    1. Just Say ‘Know’ to Teen Sex
    2. Jerry Roberts Beating Wendy McCaw
    3. California’s Great Olive Oil Flood
    4. Who’s Your Farmer?
    5. A Closer Look at the Wildfire Problem
    6. Criminal Defense Attorney Caught Buying Heroin
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.