• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

Paul Wellman

Casa Esperanza Executive Director Mike Foley lays out potential cuts facing his and other programs, should the Board of Supervisors vote to approve county staff’s plan next week


High Price for Neglect

Grand Jury Faults Supes for Shortchanging Mental Health


Thursday, June 5, 2008
By Nick Welsh (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

(Pictured above: Casa Esperanza executive director Mike Foley speaking to the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors earlier this year in defense of his program, which attempts to help the mentally ill but which faces budgetary cutbacks as a result of the statewide deficit.)

In a toughly worded nine-page report, the Santa Barbara County Grand Jury took elected officials and administrators to task for failing to seriously enough consider the needs of the mentally ill. “The Grand Jury believes that the mental health needs of the County have been given a low priority,” the report concluded. “The 1997-98 Grand Jury noted that there were insufficient psychiatric inpatient beds in Santa Barbara County and urged the Board of Supervisors to find more facilities. Ten years and several department heads later, the County has not only not added but has lost psychiatric beds so that today there are only 16 locked beds in the County.”

The report will be seized upon in the weeks ahead as the county supervisors wrestle with the chronic budget problems afflicting County Mental Health, or more precisely, the County’s Department of Alcohol, Drug and Mental Health Services. County administrators have proposed cutting the beleagured department by $8.4 million. Mental health advocates have vigorously opposed such cuts, and have been gathering their forces to wage a full scale counter-attack.

The Grand Jury noted that while most California counties are far more generous than Santa Barbara in funding their mental health programs, Santa Barbara ultimately pays a high price for its cheapness. Only 2.4 percent of the county’s Alcohol Drug and Mental Health budget comes from the general fund; in most counties, the Grand Jury concluded, that amount is 6 percent. The Grand Jury recommended that Santa Barbara increase its contribution to Mental Health to be on par of that made by most counties in the state. The Grand Jury also observed that if the county were less tightfisted, it might actually save money. “Due to lack of adequate bed space, approximately 400 patients per year are sent to Ventura’s Vista del Mar hospital at a cost of over a million dollars,” The Grand Jury found. That figure does not count the cost of transporting these patients via ambulance to Vista del Mar. The Grand Jury estimated the transportation costs alone were $500,000, but cautioned that figure might not be precise.

The psychiatric beds the Grand Jury alludes to are “lockdown” beds for patients who pose an imminent threat to themselves or to others and are the subject of court-ordered involuntary stays. The only such beds that now exist in Santa Barbara County are located at the Psychiatric Health Facility (PHF), otherwise known as the “Puff Unit,” located near the county jail. Because the PHF is almost always full, the county is forced to send other patients to Vista del Mar or other facilities outside county lines. Additionally, the Grand Jury estimated that at any time, there were 25 prisoners in county jail who more appropriately should be kept in a psychiatric hospital.

The Grand Jury found that state and federal compensation rules render the county is ineligible for any reimbursement for funds spent sending patients to psychiatric facilities outside Santa Barbara County. Were these facilities located within the county, the Grand Jury found, the same state and federal rules would allow the county to be reimbursed for 50 percent of costs.

When the Grand Jury visited this issue ten years ago, there were 24 lock-down beds in Santa Barbara County. In fact, the PHF unit has a capacity of 25 beds, but keeps nine un-used because MediCal rules provide inadequate compensation for any beds beyond 16. Since the first report, St. Francis Hospital closed its doors. With it went St. Francis’s geriatric psychiatric wing, which provided specialized care for older adults suffering dementia and other psychiatric ailments. Cottage Hospital declined to assume that burden, arguing that federal reimbursement formulas would not allow it to recoup the costs of service. For a brief period, older psychiatric patients from Santa Barbara were shipped to St. John’s Hospital in Oxnard, in a neighborhood plagued by gang activity. But eventually those beds were lost. For a few years, Cottage contracted with Santa Barbara County to accept involuntary psychiatric patients, but Cottage recently declined to renew that contract, again citing inadequate compensation as the cause. And meanwhile, there are no acute care psychiatric beds anywhere in North County.

In addition, the Grand Jury found that the county was contributing to Mental Health’s budget woes by charging the cash-strapped department $400,000 in interest this past year when the supervisors agreed to dip into reserves to keep the department budget whole. The Grand Jury said the interest payment—which is projected to hit $800,000 this coming year—serves only to exacerbate the fiscal woes plaguing the department and should be forgiven.

In 1997, the Grand Jury found “there continues to be an overwhelming need for a short-term holding facility for patients whose failure to take medications causes disruptive behavior.” The Grand Jury also urged the supervisors to “seek funding from all available sources, including a possible bond issue, to fund new facilities.” At that time, the Grand Jury concluded that 10-15 percent of the jail population belonged in such a lockdown facility. As urgently written as that report was written, fewer patients were being shipped south to Ventura than they are now — only 280 a year.

County media spokesperson William Boyer said the county would not issue an immediate response to the Grand Jury report, saying county administrators would save their powder until they formally responded to the Grand Jury, as they are required to do by law.

In the past two years, the county has opened two Crisis and Recovery Emergency Services units, one in Santa Barbara and one in Santa Maria. While these facilities do not fill the breach identified by the grand jury—accute care beds in a psychiatric lock-down facility—they are designed to address the needs of people suffering from escalating psychiatric problems before an involuntary hold becomes appropriate.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

I wish that our elected leaders had the courage to stand up for our communities most vulnerable citizens. It seems that they always make grand promises at election time and then when the vote comes, they fail to do the right thing. Even the most conservative among us has to have enough brain cells to do the math and figure out how much money can be SAVED by caring for people and avoiding tragic endings! Please, Supervisors, have some courage and really do the right thing.

outragedbyignorance (anonymous profile)
May 31, 2008 at 10:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I am so glad to see the Grand Jury looking at the issue of mental health with objective clarity. It has seemed to me all along that Santa Barbara needs to take care of mental illness despite concerns about the softening economy. Data shows that it is an investment that pays off in the long run. As a citizen and taxpayer, it is the kind of investment I support and hope the Board of Supervisors takes action to support funding critical services too.

citizenjane (anonymous profile)
June 1, 2008 at 7:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Well thank you Grand Jury!! It's about time somebody stood up for the debacle that the CEO Mike Brown is allowing. I have only worked for ADMHS for a few years, but what has been proposed including gutting the CBOs is horrific. But the Board of Supervisors has relinquished most of their power (except for a few window dressing comments) to Mr. Brown. And on top of that they are afraid of the union. So what will happen, the mentally ill will suffer, but haven't they suffered enough, read the Grand Jury Report. That's why I like Steve Pappas, he calls for the elimination of the CEO position. Oh but then, the Board would have to take responsiblity like in the old days!! Let's see if they have the cajones for the job and I can't wait to see their response to the Grand Jury. Thank you Nick Welsh!!

MarianneG (anonymous profile)
June 1, 2008 at 9:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)

ADMHS (isn't that a mouthful?) is a good part of the problem that has been known and still has persisted for DECADES in this county. ADMHS has refused to take on the hard work, filling PHF with the tame and calm and easily handled and shipping the difficult work out of county. The expense of this had long been known but the passive agressive ADMHS administration, while promising to do something, has never been willing to do what counts--spend money and their own political capital on this problem. And then there's the gross budgetary incompetence of ADMHS which has created big budget problems for their clients (but somehow, not for their administrators staffing level). This group deserves to be scrapped and "reinvented" big time. Because of this it would be folly to give significant funds to these wastrels. And don't look to Mike Brown for help--he has already managed this problem to its present impasse.

RHS (anonymous profile)
June 2, 2008 at 3:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)

First, hurray for the Grand Jury... someone with some authority needs to illuminate this issue in SB County to the point where there has to be some accountability. But to say that the Bd of Sup's are afraid of the union is over-kill. The union works closely with the Board, and the union rightfully advocates for the patients' needs and the staff needs. The staff deserve every penny they earn, they do a very difficult job with heart and perseverance. I know there are some useless admin staff, but not all, and the front line staff are dedicated and hard working people who are walking the talk that those of us who are commenting here want to see SB county offer. Go Get 'Em.

mensunderpanties (anonymous profile)
June 3, 2008 at 8:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Why is the Glendon Association fighting like hell for a suicide barrier on the Cold Spring Bridge, but silent on this issue?

EscapeTheCult (anonymous profile)
June 5, 2008 at 11:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)

This article and the Grand Jury report illustrate why the Board of Supervisors should postpone entertaining the proposed and inaccurate and ill-advised budget until such time that they are fully informed and confident that they can make choices that are in the best interests of the taxpayers of this county. To voice your opposition, I encourage you to attend the budget hearing on Monday. The ADMHS budget discussion is scheduled to take place at 2:45 on Monday at County Administration Building in Santa Barbara.

RogerThompson (anonymous profile)
June 7, 2008 at 3:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Thank you RHS, the only voice on this topic that sees ADMHS's wasteful spending and mismanaged budget. Why do you think there have been so many turnovers at the top? Why do you think ADMHS contracts with a private company to provide their crisis response services (AMR's MHAT Team), why do you think there are so many mentally ill, homeless, substance abusing individuals wandering our streets? It's because ADMHS does not want to do the dirty work. They spend their money on fluffy programs like the Lompoc teen drop In center. God forbid you need help if your a teen in crisi in the south county. How about the fact that if you are not already in the mental health system, and you have a psychotic break, you can't really GET into the system through ADMHS's new CARES program...I could go on and on.

It is time for reform, from how mental heath services are provided, to how they are managed and budgeted. It's going to take a lot of hard work, buy in from the public and private sector, and a leader who is willing to stand up to the politicos and spear head reform.

VoiceofSB (anonymous profile)
June 10, 2008 at 8:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Good, informative article. Thank you Nick.

billclausen (anonymous profile)
June 10, 2008 at 2:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

When is the Grand Jury going to continue its way through the County hallways and uncover the unhealthy, illicit relationships with more than one developer? Michelle Gibbs was telling the truth.

spike (anonymous profile)
June 13, 2008 at 1:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Clear Sky
Temperature:
48.9°
Wind:
3 NNE

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Local Heroes 2008
  • Best Of 2008
  • Tea Fire 2008
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • The Year of Hope and Fire
  • Peace Corps Wants You
  • Tech Mogul Brings Laptops to Kellogg Kids
  • The Chaparral Is Not Our Enemy
  • Fishbon’s Art of Participatory Celebration
  • Rose Bowl-Colored Glasses
  1. Jerry Roberts Beating Wendy McCaw
  2. Just Say ‘Know’ to Teen Sex
  3. A Closer Look at the Wildfire Problem
  4. Who’s Your Farmer?
  5. Suit Against Bruce Nelson Settled
  6. 24th Santa Barbara International Film Festival Unveiled
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.