• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    SB Bank & Trust Downsizing

    Moving Headquarters Back to Original Digs


    Monday, February 1, 2010
    By Barney Brantingham (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Cutting Losses: Financially troubled Santa Barbara Bank & Trust says it’s going to save a million a year by moving from its huge headquarters building at 1021 Anacapa Street “back home,” to its original digs at the downtown main branch.

    Meanwhile, there are rumors that the trimmed-down SBB&T may be acquired by the giant San Francisco-based Union Bank of California. If that deal goes through it would mean that the small-town bank opened 50 years ago by three local businessmen—Louis Lancaster, Reuben Irvin and Ralph Raddue—will be owned by Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Union’s parent company.

    The Santa Barbara bank, in its year-end report issued today, said it lost $20 million in the fourth quarter, half its third quarter loss of $40.7 million. But Fred Clough, bank attorney, pointed out that the bank made $10 million before taxes and provisions for bad loans, compared with a $6 million loss a year ago.

    Asked why the bank is moving from the current headquarters, Clough told the Independent, “Because it costs us $1 million a year” to lease the space for 65 employees. Bank officers will move to the top floor of the Santa Barbara-style, white stucco, red tile-roofed main branch at Carrillo and Anacapa, while other departments will be relocated elsewhere, Clough said. Trust personnel will move to the old Firehouse building in Montecito on East Valley Road, leased by the bank since 2008 but unoccupied, according to spokeswoman Debbie Whiteley.

    Moving back into the building where the bank opened 50 years ago will be celebrated on its birthday, March 16, Whiteley said. “We’re going home.”

    One local businessman who heard the news called the huge leased building a “Taj Mahal” the bank couldn’t afford any longer. It has room for 107 employees.

    “It will be a smaller bank,” said George Leis, president and CEO of SBB&T and its holding company, Pacific Capital Bancorp. He said the bank is looking sell certain unidentified branches, and needs to refocus on markets with stronger positioning and “brand loyalty.” This seemed a hint that Pacific Capital is thinking of unloading banks it purchased in central and northern California but which do not operate under the Santa Barbara Bank name.

    It hasn’t been determined which branches will be sold, Clough said.

    The bank also announced that it plans to slash operating costs by $25 million this year.

    Although the Santa Barbara banking icon lost a total of $431 million last year, sweeping cuts in costs prevented another horrendous quarterly loss (the worst was $362 million in the second quarter of 2009) and for now at least, SBB&T seems to have dodged the possibility of a federal takeover.

    Still, its tier-one capital ratio remained far below the mark federal regulators set last year and continues to be worrisome. Its leverage ratio, cash divided by loans and other assets, as of December 31 was 5.5 percent, whereas it promised feds it would hike the ratio to 9 percent.

    The bank recently acted to slash costs by, among other things, dumping Medicare-eligible retirees from its medical plan and hiking medical costs for other retirees. These actions helped the balance sheet but are painful for retirees counting on dividends and the health plan. The bank also cut 300 jobs last year, and 47 more this month.

    The bank also sold some loans. And it has stopped paying stock dividends, as required since it was not making payments on the federal $180 million TARP loan.

    All eyes in the financial community will be looking ahead to see if the bank’s first quarter 2010 balance sheet ends up in the black.

    Pacific Capital Bancorp operates 46 branches, including 11 in central and northern California under other names. They are in Gilroy, Morgan Hill and San Juan Bautista under the South Valley National Bank name, three in Watsonville, Salinas and Monterey under the First National Bank of Central California name and two in Hollister and one in San Juan Bautista under the San Benito Bank name and two branches of the First Bank of San Luis Obispo.

    One former administrator told the Independent that at times some of the northern banks seemed to operate with excessive independence, like far-flung fiefdoms. However, it is unknown which branches generated many of the toxic loans that helped bring about the parent Pacific Capital’s red ink.

    Pacific Capital’s stock was up slightly to $1.28 today—but down from about $13 a year ago, and $20 about 18 months ago.

    Leis sounded an optimistic note today: “While previously identified problem loans continue to drive elevated levels of net charge-offs, we are encouraged that the inflow of new delinquent loans slowed considerably during the fourth quarter.

    “Loans that are two to three payments past due declined from $116 million at September 30 to $79 million at December 31, 2009.”

    Union Bank is 145 years old, and has $78 billion in assets and 332 offices in California, Oregon, Washington and Texas.

    Barney Brantingham can be reached at barney@independent.com or (805) 965-5205, Ext. 230. He writes online columns and a print column on Thursdays

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Thank you for the informative article, but please remove the comment above which is blatant advertising.

    suebutcher (anonymous profile)
    February 1, 2010 at 5:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    This shows how little I know about business. This bank can lose $431M and still stay in business. Even with the TARP loan of $180 M that is more than a few fill ups at the gas station difference. Even with $78 B of assets, I just do not understand how that would make a difference. If I had a house ($ 78 B assets) and lost a good chunk of the roof ($431 M loss), that would be a house that would not be able to function and would have to be repaired or torn down.

    Bird (anonymous profile)
    February 3, 2010 at 8:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    This American Life did a great show on the trouble with banks called "Bad Bank". Listen here:

    http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio...

    EastBeach (anonymous profile)
    February 4, 2010 at 2:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    As a former employee of SBB&T, and owner of the now greatly devalued stock (which is offered as part of their pension plan and incentive to employees to remain through many years of vesting), I am very disappointed in the bank's foolish expansion and loan decisions which have jeopardized all their loyal employees' and stockholders futures!

    When I think of all the huge bonuses paid to the top executives there throughout the years, which could have instead shored up the bank's promises to it's retirees, former employee's and all other stockholders, it is truly heart-sickening! I was foolish, myself, to hold onto that stock, believing the bank was fiscally conservative, as it started out being. But sadly, the bank had turned a greedy eye toward loans to developers, who themselves rode a wave of greed... Make money fast, allocate it to the 'top executives' as a reward, and to hell with everyone is the modus operandi with the bank's management.

    maggi (anonymous profile)
    February 4, 2010 at 11:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    I worked for SBBT for 18 years, held up my next career that I was pursuing because I could take retirement and they would pay so much of my health insurance coverage. Only now they are not only going back on their promise but their stocks which I hold a lot of have gone plummeting down that was another benefit I originally got from working their, my salary was not much of a benefit as they paid a very poor wage for being a telephone technician which is what I was at one point. They still quote themselves as being a community bank that helps the community but they have not been that for quite some time now they are like most big banks nickling and dimming people out of their money for their profits, well actually their losses right now whilst their President makes the biggest profit, which does not make any sense to me why should be be rewarded for breaking the bank or robbing the bank, they should not advertise as a community bank because they are not, they could have done much better if they had gone back to the way they were founded. Shame on you Santa Barbara Bank and Trust shame on you. We the stockholders should take the bank back and run it the way it was created to run

    limeysue (anonymous profile)
    February 4, 2010 at 7:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Wow, Santa Barbara National Bank is in trouble? In real estate rich Santa Barbara which is not suffering half as bad as the rest of the country? Does that mean the bank blew it even worse than other than other notable failures in this downturn economy? Did the Board of Directors take their eye off the ball and bring in shooting star CEO talent not old enough to recall that there is an economic cycle called boom and bust and that banks are supposed to know this and maintain reserves for the bust part of the cycle? Amazing. Thank the Lord they are too big to fail just not big enough to protect the workers who put their life's blood into a once great community bank.

    contactjohn (anonymous profile)
    February 5, 2010 at 2:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    how do they continue to loose all this money and the Board remains unchanged??

    Something smells rotten.

    slowjoe (anonymous profile)
    February 5, 2010 at 11:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    I am under the impression that it is not really SBB&T's fault on a lot of this but Pacific Bank Corp., which is the parent company. It was PBC that was making those iffy tax loan "scams" and also they and some of their affiliates that made construction loans in Inland Empire that exploded with the housing bubble that is the root of a lot of the problems.

    However...I do have a problem with their nickle and dimeing of late with expanded fees etc...

    Just saying.

    laszlo (Laszlo Hodosy)
    February 10, 2010 at 4:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    As Gomer Pyle would say "surprise, surprise." Pacific Capital Bancorp (formenrly SBB&T) began its journey down the road to ruin when it decided to focus on Refund Anticipation Loans (RALs) and growth by acquisition around the year 2000. The former president ("Tom" Thomas) and his cronies all came from Security Pacific in L.A which failed long before the financial/ mortgage crisis hit in 2008. The writing was on the wall long before the "surprise" larger than expected bad loan loss was publicly revealed in 2008. At one point, the stock traded for 4 times book value, an unheard of premium for a bank unless it is a takeover candidate. (The most likely acquirer at the time? Washington Mutual, which was nationalized by the U.S Gov't during the financial meltdown). In any event, the Thomas administration gobbled up Cental Coast regional banks willy nilly with scant regard to how they would digest these acquisitions. In fact, the head of IT at the time tried to cover up a large loss related to the bank's inability to consolidate their new brethern, until it was publicly revealed. How a "community bank" justified what amounts to financial larceny by participating in a RAL program actively targeted at the poor and Hispanic community is beyond me. Why do you think they issued those large, teaser-rate CDs every December? The interest rate on an average refund of $200 for two weeks with a $50 "service charge" amounts to over 600% annuallly!
    Yes, I worked for the bank for a number of years, and finally left when Don Anderson, the 2nd in command at the time, told me "when someone wants to get out of the pool, our job is to push them back in." Cheers, Chumash tribe! Hope you stay in the pool long enough to at least get a few cents back on your investment.
    I'll say this about Mr. Thomas, he had one skill that all good bank presidents should possess - he was really good at remembering names. Pity that was apparently it. The rest of them, Fred Clough included, should be doing the perp walk for the fraud they committed.

    LittleBoPeep (anonymous profile)
    February 10, 2010 at 9:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Wow, way to go, LittleBoPeep!
    Thanks for sharing this info. with us all. In my position at the bank, I wasn't able to have your insights into the problems. All I saw was a culture that failed to support 'the little people' and so I knew there was something 'rotten in Denmark', as they say, with the whole culture at SBB&T!

    maggi (anonymous profile)
    February 11, 2010 at 9:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    I began working at SBBT when they only had 12 branches. David Spainhour ran the bank and he was lovely. Then Tom Thomas took over and all hell broke loose. Too many small bank purchases, too much greed. By the time I left they had over 50 branches and things were sliding downhill. The execs ALWAYS got their bonuses while stock declined and lay-offs occurred. So unfortunate for a once strong community bank.

    geekbride (anonymous profile)
    February 11, 2010 at 11:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Log in to comment

    Forgotten your password?

    Sign up

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Fair
    Temperature:
    53.0°
    Wind:
    5 N

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2010
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2009
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • How the Irish Saved Mission Santa Ines
    • Nicholas and Richard Den
    • Charting a Course
    • Rolling Dogs Gather No Bark
    • Weekend Concert Roundup
    • The Hottest Ice Cream in Town
    1. Embezzler Gets Eight Years
    2. New Santa Barbara-Based Reality Show Announces Casting Call
    3. Free Tilly?
    4. What’s in a Name?
    5. UCSB Faculty’s Highest Honor Goes to Hasegawa
    6. They’re the Tax Dodgers
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2010 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.