• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

With Dog at My Side


Thursday, May 29, 2008
By Nick Welsh (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

RIP: One of the simple pleasures of my life is cresting the steep round belly of the Micheltorena Street bridge early in the morning. If you time it right, you can catch the early lights of dawn just starting to peek through over the ocean. Witnessing this, I always feel as though I’ve been let in on some great secret. It’s a blessing I never fail to count. Around this time, as the nation observes Memorial Day, I can’t cross my favorite bridge without thinking of Mike Murdy. Six years ago, Mike, then a 57-year-old state employee, chucked himself over the Micheltorena Street bridge and plummeted into the concrete culvert down below. By the time anyone found him, Elvis had left the building and Mike was dead.

Angry Poodle Barbecue

I had known Mike Murdy as one of the more cheerfully shameless media hounds in town. Every year around August, he’d start calling, wanting to know if the paper was interested in publishing his preseason prognostications about which team would win the Super Bowl. We rarely were, and he, it turns out, was rarely right. Mostly, Mike was up to his elbows in the politics of homelessness. That was back in the day when people still thought they could do something about it. As a former U.S. serviceman who served in the Vietnam War, Mike recognized that many living on the streets were fellow vets. He did what he could to help. And a whole lot more. To that end, he was always calling, dropping tips, and humping my leg for publicity. Mike reveled in the clandestine trappings of our exchanges, reminding me repeatedly that what he was saying was “strictly off the record.” In time, he came to identify himself as “Mr. OTR” when calling the paper. During our calls, you could easily imagine Mike craning his neck to ensure no one where he worked knew what he was up to. Rarely were Mike’s inside tips all that electrifying. Mostly, they were about some event he was holding to help the homeless — a Thanksgiving meal, for example. A job skills workshop. And even as other activists grew weary of the issue, realizing that it could never be “solved,” Mr. OTR never stopped calling. He never stopped caring.

Mike was a long way from the highlands of Vietnam — where he saw more than he ever should have from the inside of his army tank — when he jumped. And even though his death came 31 years after his tour of duty concluded, I figure he qualifies as a casualty of war. As such, his passing should be among the military casualties we observe on Memorial Day. At the time of his death, Mike’s friends explained he never got over what happened in Vietnam. It never stopped intruding on his life. During the Vietnam War, 58,000 American servicemen and women were killed in action. For many years, it was reported that an equal number killed themselves afterward. Now, military apologists are claiming the real number of post-combat suicides is closer to 9,000. Either way, it’s a big number. And either way, no one really knows for sure.

Bringing Mike closer to mind are recent news reports on the escalating mental health problems suffered by Iraqi War vets. The Pentagon itself just announced that the number of troops suffering from what’s called Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder jumped by no less than 46 percent last year, a spike that coincides with the decision to increase the length of tours of duty from 12 months to 15. According to the Pentagon, this brings the grand total of shell-shocked vets to 40,000 since the outbreak of war. A few weeks earlier, the RAND Corporation had issued an even more drastic report on the same subject, predicting a more accurate number would be 300,000.

Whatever the true number is has yet to be determined. But we do know it will completely overwhelm the paltry health resources of the communities into which these vets will return. Many will adjust over time. Others will not. Some of these will choose to end their pain the way Mike did; others will share their suffering as one Santa Barbara vet did a few years back, killing his father and then himself. This is the collateral damage of any war, just or unjust. But the real motives of the war we’ve been waging in Iraq for the past five years remain as mystifying and murky as when we first started. Weapons of mass destruction? None were found in the 700 UN inspections preceding the war; none have been found since. To secure a safe and plentiful oil supply? Look at the prices. To democratize the Middle East under some reverse-domino theory? So President George W. Bush could settle some festering oedipal score with his father? To hasten the Second Coming of Christ by precipitating the End of Days? You tell me. Nothing makes sense. It never has. Bush’s former spokesperson Scott McClellan has just written a new book accusing the White House of selling the war under false pretenses. Thanks a lot, Scott. Why didn’t you say so when it still mattered?

It’s been the sick genius of the Bush administration to wage a full-scale war that strategically left a huge chunk of the populace virtually untouched, unmoved, or even the least bit inconvenienced. When it comes to pain and sacrifice, we do not share and share alike. Bush has seen to that. Rural whites and urban minorities — united in their relative poverty — have borne the full burden of the war effort. Not since the Civil War, where those with means were allowed to pay the poor to fight in their place, has the nation asked those with so little to give so much.

This morning, as I rode my bike up the belly of the bridge, I thought of the hapless Mexican governor after whom it was named. In 1845, Manuel Micheltorena was chased from power in the now infamous Battle of Cahuenga Pass. There, from a safe distance, the two warring sides fired away at one another until they ran out of ammo. When the smoke cleared, the only casualties were one dead horse and one dead mule. History may remember Micheltorena as a silly man who lost a silly war. But there are far worse things. Like being dead because of a pointless war. Just ask Mike Murdy.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

As usual, Nick, you're the best
Marcia

mcsherman (anonymous profile)
May 29, 2008 at 8:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)

NIck Welsh asks Scott McClellan; Why didn’t you say so when it still mattered? I understand Nick's sentiment. Perhaps McClellan should have spoke up much sooner. It still does matter. Unfortunately many of us also did our job. We all fell in line and went shopping as requested. Our government on automatic pilot while we shopped? How ridiculous! So now this country is responsible for a lot of misery not just here but more importantly abroad in Iraq. The soldiers did what we asked them to do. We went shopping! I am very disappointed in our country and many of the people I know. The ideals are there but there is little substance. This country needs to tell the truth for those who it will still matter for.

johnathansmith (anonymous profile)
May 29, 2008 at 12:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Per the problems with foreign policy: At play here is the coming together of the worst elements of Left-wing and Right-wing thought.

While decadence has always been part of life and lives within each of us, the U.S. now CELEBRATES it in all forms. We see it on T.V. 24/7. It's on our college campuses, it's everywhere. The Muslim world sees this and wants no part of the drunken sexual debauchery that has become mainstream U.S. culture.

Right-wing militarism complements this phenomena. This mentality naively believes that somehow the U.S./Western World is going to walk into the Middle East, give the kids toothpaste and toys, and voila, the mullahs and the caliphs are going to fall in love with us. All the while the Moral Majority types think we're in God's favor because they go to church when in point of fact if they read their Bible they would know it speaks of God judging decadent nations and the U.S. certainly fits the description of a decadent nation that has blown many God-given opportunities.

So here is U.S. policy: Going into an ultra-religious part of the world and telling them about how moral and upstanding the U.S. is and telling them how to behave all the while the Muslims see what goes on here and want no part of it.

Solution: Clean up our lives, and--to quote George Washington--"Beware of Foreign Entanglements".

If the Muslim world were angry simply because of our prosperity, why aren't they obsessed with Norway...or Japan...or New Zealand as they are with the U.S.?

All the while people are dying in the Middle East and coming back here traumatized.

Like the song "Where have all the Flowers Gone" asks "When will they ever learn?"

billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 30, 2008 at 12:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)

George Washington--"Beware of Foreign Entanglements".

Dwight Eisenhower--"Beware the Military-Industrial Complex."

both certainly apply.

BTW, Scott McClellan DID say something about not speaking sooner--to someone else. Former national security advisor Richard A. Clarke had written a previous "tell all" book, and McClellan criticized him for not saying something "at the time", and accused him of just wanting to pimp his book.

So, he's a hypocrite, but an apologetic one: http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4...

equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
May 30, 2008 at 2:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Broken Clouds
Temperature:
68.0°
Wind:
10 W

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • How a Group of Ex-Catholic Nuns Saved Their Famous Montecito Retreat Center
  • What Dems Are Doing in Denver While Republicans Ready for St. Paul
  • Santa Barbara Eyes Black Gold
  • Assessing Nuclear Dangers 63 Years Later
  • Santa Barbara’s Studio Artists Open Their Doors
  • Starting Your Cool Season Garden
  1. The Rockstar Who Would Save the World
  2. UCSB, Westmont Make List of Top Colleges
  3. Naples Dream Development Becoming Reality?
  4. Federal Cannabis Patient to Lead Medical Marijuana March
  5. Woman Who Broke Neck in SB Triathlon Dies
  6. Rogers Brings Home the Gold
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.