As its July 27 meeting, the Santa Barbara City Council denied Bricks Cafe’s appeal of the Police & Fire Commission’s decision to reject the State Street nightspot’s application for a dance permit.
Bricks, located on 509 State Street, submitted an appeal for a dance permit on May 9, the conditions of which included dancing until midnight on varying nights for up to 20 people with live entertainment only and an addition of several safety measures. Owner, Wallace Ronchietto also wants his Alcoholic and Beverage Control (ABC) license to be amended. On June 23, he also submitted a formal request for the removal of two conditions: the prohibition of amplified music and the requirement that entertainment acts be placed only at the front of Bricks, near the windows facing the street.
Bricks had previously been cited for violating its ABC license. On April 6, a police officer reported amplified music from a disc jockey as well as about 20 people dancing. On June 13 and June 28 there was, again, amplified music. According to Ronchietto, the manager who was in charge on April 6th has since been fired. He claims to have had no idea about the incident.
The Police and Fire Commission originally shot down the dance permit for several reasons, including what it deemed an unnecessary increase in the number of dance permits in the State Street’s entertainment district (mainly the 500 block), as well as prior ABC violations, the conflict with current ABC license conditions, and a possible increase in crime and police involvement. There has also been opposition by neighbors concerned with possible noise, drunken crowds, and crime.
The council ultimately suggested that Ronchietto seek a “type two” entertainment license — which would allow a non-amplified band to play for a dance floor.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
I'm glad the city council made this decision. While I wish no evil against the owner of this club, one must remember that residents and hotel proprieters and their guest have rights too--such as getting a good night's sleep.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2008 at 12:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Santa Barbara is a city where people live. It isn't a bar. Unless these bars want to do business in an industrial area with no residences or hotels, then they are going to have to suck it up and deal with neighbors who want to actually enjoy their own homes, and visitors who actually want to get some sleep without listening to pounding music or dealing with drunks relieving themselves on their lawns and throwing up on the sidewalks.
Whatphotosb, if you want to live in a bar, go move into one. The people who live downtown are standing up and saying no more, so deal with it.
Holly (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2008 at 2:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Whatphotosb: What facts am I missing? The damage doesn't end at the noise generated from the music itself, but the hordes of drunks who wander onto private property and make noise and use people's lawns as toilets.
There is also the danger of the mob mentality that occurs when too many drunks gather in one place, and when I say "one place", I mean the collective place of lower state street.
Also, the residents and perhaps (I may stand to be corrected) the hotel proprietors were there first, so by all that's right and moral, their rights come first.
I find it interesting that based on other posts you've written, you rail against the decadence of our culture--a point with we you and I agree--yet based on this post you give the bar scene a free pass on this.
You also talk at length about the gang problem. Back about 1996 or 1997 (I forget the year but will never forget the incident) I was on duty as a security guard and had I started my round about a minute earlier I would have walked right into the line of fire of the Lot 10 fatal gang-related shooting. The men involved had come out of a nearby bar.
In short, the gang problem, decadence and excessive drinking are all part of the same root problem and that is why hotel people and residents are saying "no" to the endless spread of the bar scene.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2008 at 2:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment