This week, I got out into the open as I try to do every week, exercising a little and enjoying a lot. In my wandering, I found myself at the Goleta Bluffs, an area that I have cherished during the decade that I have lived here. After living many years of my life in Mexico City’s forest of concrete, Goleta represents an oasis of open space, ocean, and emerald green views of the hills and the mountains.
In fact, many times I choose to take Cathedral Oaks Road instead of the freeway or Hollister, just to get closer to the orchards. Like many other “Goletanos,” I am no planner and no environmentalist, but I appreciate the quality of life that these open spaces offer. They represent to me a peaceful feeling of freedom.
However, the bluffs look quite different now that a multi-million housing development interrupts the vastness of nature, cutting it by half, thus leaving to the public two practically inaccessible, useless areas.
Meanwhile, a couple of crude oil tanks can be found about two miles down from the Bacara Resort and Spa, making for an ironic blend of pricey expansion and dirty industry.
Since I was feeling so passionately about these threats to the quality of life in Goleta, and frankly upset that we have let these things happen, I wondered how much residents know about permit issuance. So I took my pen, and a notebook, and placed myself at the Goleta Marketplace to ask people about these things. Here is my very informal, nonscientific survey:
The Method: I asked two questions of 20 people from different age, gender, social, and racial groups, all Goleta residents. My little survey included whites, Latinos, Asians, and African Americans. The youngest individual was 10 years old, and the oldest was 68. Education levels ranged from grammar school to graduate school. I spoke with business owners, workers, students, and stay-at-home moms.
This is what I asked them: 1) Do you know that a hotel will be built on the corner of Storke Road and Hollister Avenue?
Results: None of them knew about it. Of the respondents, 12 were surprised by the location selected for a hotel, 14 were concerned about the traffic impact that the project might have, and four people liked the idea considering the number of jobs that the hotel will bring to the area, thus building our economy.
Four people disagreed with the decision completely, saying that if we are to build anything, it should be affordable housing units, not hotels. Two people emphatically disagreed with the idea of new view-blocking buildings altogether.
2) Do you know that the Goleta Planning Commission is studying a plan for another hotel across from the airport on Hollister Avenue?
Results: None of them knew about this either. In the beginning, 17 out of 20 didn’t understand that if this second one is approved, two different hotels will be built. They thought that it was one or the other, and in that case the one across from the airport made more sense. When they realized that both hotels may be approved, only three people supported both projects--considering them a good idea based on the jobs that would be created--but 17 thought it would be too much for our city.
Interesting facts: Only one person showed interest about the number of rooms and the height of these projects. (One respondent, a contractor, hinted that a hotel of 112 rooms would be at least three-stories tall.) The best and most inspiring thing I found was that the youths, ages 10-15 years old, had strong opinions and were as vocal as the grownups (in favor or against, whatever the case may be). Sadly, the group that seemed most indifferent were the young adults ages 18 – 25, who provided very little or no feedback.
I thoroughly enjoyed asking these questions of my neighbors, and hearing what they had to say about important things that affect us all. After chatting with them, I was left with one question (please excuse my ignorance): Does the Planning Commission have approval limits per year or per type of project?
UPDATE ON POLITICS: Yes, there is a Republican candidate running against Democratic incumbent Representative Lois Capps. Interestingly enough, it was none other than Lois Capps’s office (not the challenger himself) that corrected me on this, which I appreciate. The Republican's name is Matt T. Kokkonen, a financial planner and resident of San Luis Obispo. Kokkonen ran in 2004 for the California State Assembly, District 33, and according to the Project Vote Smart Web site was a member of the Budget Advisory Committee for the San Luis Coastal Unified School District.
Regarding my question about what the future might hold, politically speaking, for Lois Capps, her press secretary, Emily Kryder, declined to comment and said that, for the time being, Capps is concentrated on winning the 23rd Congressional District race again on November 4.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This




Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
Is the public really well served by a writer writing on this topic who knows nothing about it? This is not about the political perspective, just a reasonable information base upon which to start. Regardless of what one might think about Margaret Connell's position on Goleta land use, she absolutely knows the subject. Ms. Uribe would better serve your readers by writing on subjects she may be more qualified to offer an informed perspective on.
sbreader (anonymous profile)
August 18, 2008 at 12:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Progressives are always looking for "institutional racism." Well how about this sentence
"My little survey included whites, Latinos, Asians, and African-Americans."
So whites are the only group who do not deserve to be capitalized. Says something about how "whites" are viewed by the Progressive (progressive) community.
revisionist (anonymous profile)
August 18, 2008 at 1:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The decision not to capitalize whites was an editing change; just letting you know in case you are inclined to blame the writer. The Independent of course welcomes your opinions on the subject.
martha (Martha Sadler)
August 18, 2008 at 2:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"The decision not to capitalize whites was an editing change; just letting you know in case you are inclined to blame the writer. The Independent of course welcomes your opinions on the subject"
Aren't all nouns to be capitalized?
billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 18, 2008 at 8:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think another question Mrs. Uribe should have asked in her non-scientific survey is what types of media did her subjects partake in? With the News-Press as it is, perhaps the people she interviewed were not online-news readers. Both the projects she mentioned have been in the Independent and Daily Sound.
Flash (anonymous profile)
August 18, 2008 at 8:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
In conducting her survey, Ms Uribe could have asked a third question: "Do you know that the Goleta Design Review Board has reviewed plans for another hotel at the corner of Storke Road and Phelps Road?" This hotel was long planned as a part of the Camino Real Marketplace complex, along with a soccer field and an ice skating rink that have yet to be built. Notices that the DRB would be reviewing each of these three proposed hotel projects appeared in the Goleta Valley Voice and in the DRB agendas posted on the City of Goleta website http://goleta.govoffice.com/
wignoutinca (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2008 at 12:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I've always said that a community should be built for the people that live there, not the tourists. If you do a good job, the tourists will come. Hotels are not needed until we get our act together on downtown Goleta. The new one there is always empty.
VetteGuy (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2008 at 4:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
<i>Aren't all nouns to be capitalized?</i>
It's a Matter of Style and customary Usage. Perhaps you've noticed that most capitalized Words are proper Nouns. In the Case of ethnic Groups, capitalization is reserved for Groups that come from Regions that are considered proper Nouns, such as Asia, Africa, Latin America, etc. I'm afraid there is no such as Place as White. Or Black. So, we get whites, Asians, blacks, Africans, Middle Easterners, etc.
Easy, no?
MrMoreno (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2008 at 5:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Easy, no?"
Esperanto is looking better and better all the time as the language we all should be speaking. No complicated cases, genders, words spelled one way and prounounced the other, or any of that nonsense.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2008 at 7:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
No, not so easy. In my son's recent Black Studies class @ UCSB he was specifically told to capitalize "Blacks" and not "whites". The reason for this is obscure, to him as well as me. Perhaps only minorities get capitalized? In any event, it was a writing class and, so as not to be penalized, did as he was told. Perhaps Martha Sadler knows why since she made the editorial change. My guess is it's about being PC.
Moonfruit (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2008 at 7:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Show me a Latino Americano that isnt White, African and/or Asian, anyway. But because they roll their 'rs' they get their own
catagory. How cute.
GM
genamethuen (anonymous profile)
August 21, 2008 at 1:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment