• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

    Ben Ciccati

    How My Unquestioned Faith in the Medical Profession Went Under the Knife


    Thursday, August 14, 2008
    By Ericka Dixon
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Recently, I, like thousands of women, faced the prospect of major invasive surgery, but found out by chance that I had another option. Here is the story of my journey, which has turned me into an accidental, unofficial advocate for other women walking the same road.

    Diagnosed with a large mass in my ovary and premature menopause, I consulted a well-respected gynecologist about my options. That doctor, a charming and capable woman, advised me to have a traditional abdominal hysterectomy and removal of my cervix. When I asked about laparoscopic surgery, she sternly cautioned me against it. She told me not enough of them had been performed and that flat out, laparoscopic surgery is not safe.

    I liked this doctor very much. I trusted her. She’s a very experienced doctor with a good reputation. I was ready to schedule the surgery. Get that thing, possibly a tumor, out of me as soon as possible! And yes, please, why not a hysterectomy at the same time, to address my ongoing symptoms of menopause. When my husband pressed me to pursue a second opinion to explore the laparoscopic option, I balked. Why should I? My doctor said it’s not safe.

    A nagging voice in my head (or was it my husband?) told me to get a second opinion. I asked my primary physician, Dr. Barbara Hrach, to refer me to another gynecologist. She sent me to Dr. Duncan Turner, obstetrician/gynecologist, for a consultation. There, I was given a choice that many women facing surgery are never informed of. What an eye opener! Option one: Outpatient laparoscopic surgery, allowing me to walk within hours of the operation and function normally within a week (with one additional week of feeling tired, but nothing an afternoon nap won’t solve); minimal pain medication required; and a significantly reduced risk of infection and scarring due to a few very small “holes” rather than a large incision in my abdomen.

    Or, option two: Traditional hysterectomy, a procedure unchanged for 70 years, that would have me in the hospital for three nights and then resting at home for a month, taking intravenous narcotic pain medication while in the hospital and then orally for several weeks; significantly increased risk of infection along with a large scar; and removal of my cervix, which is completely unnecessary in most cases.

    I chose laparoscopic surgery. I enjoyed a speedy recovery that required only Advil for my pain after the first 48 hours, my scars are practically invisible, and I have had zero complications.

    When the laparoscopic surgical option became available for men undergoing radical prostatectomy six years ago, it quickly became the gold standard. Yet the equivalent technology for women’s surgery, which has been available and used successfully for 20 years, is widely ignored. Advanced gynecological laparoscopic surgery is not taught in medical schools, nor is it on the licensing exams to become a doctor. It was not taught in residency programs until recently, and most gynecologists have had no formal training in the technique. However, hundreds of gynecologists have taken it upon themselves to become trained and proficient in this technology because, without question, it is better for their patients.

    Why is a man offered the latest and greatest techniques while a woman is not? Why is a woman not told there is something that will keep her intact, off drugs, and able to function quickly after surgery? Isn’t this difference in the standard of care for men and women blatantly sexist? How could it possibly be ethical?

    When I asked Dr. Turner why laparoscopic surgery isn’t the norm for women, he replied that female patients haven’t driven the demand for change. That men furiously guard their “manhood” and demand that their doctors do so, too. That if women don’t yell loud enough to protect their “womanhood” and demand that women’s healthcare be brought up to par with men’s, the medical establishment won’t be forced to listen.

    I’m yelling. My voice alone isn’t enough, though. Join me in demanding equality. We deserve it.

    Ericka Dixon is a homemaker and accidental advocate for women’s health.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Also bear in mind that there has been the unspoken "Women's Movement" but the problem with this is that it depends on high-profile individuals to do the work. The same is true with Civil Rights movements.

    The true power in any cause is when individuals at the grassroots level demand change, compare notes and share their experiences with each other, and become self-reliant as individual and THEN pool their energies together instead of waiting for some leader up high to do it for them.

    I don't know enough about the medical aspect of the subject matter at hand other than to say that I had laproscopic surgery to remove my gall bladder back in 2001 and never had any ill effects since.

    Could it be that there is a financial incentive for the medical world to perform these more complex--and possibly more dangerous surgeries?

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    August 14, 2008 at 2:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Pretty insulting to say "female patients haven’t driven the demand for change". If non invasive surgery is not explained, how would we know?

    Unfortunately I was made to believe that traditional abdominal hysterectomy was my only choice. With my beloved sister saying no!! I went ahead with the surgery.

    Fifteen years later I refuse to be bitter and pray for equality.

    sbpaddy (anonymous profile)
    August 15, 2008 at 9:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Unfortunately, issues such as insurance reimbursement, malpractice coverage and guidelines set by Healthcare Administrators greatly impact the physician’s recommendations and subsequently treatment options. Our national healthcare system needs a major overhaul. Until this occurs the burden is upon the individual to do their own research and to find a courageous and skilled physician to perform the procedure.

    mandresen (anonymous profile)
    August 15, 2008 at 9:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    I had a similar problem. I went to 3 local OB/Gyns and 1 in LA. I had a great experience with a woman doc here in SB. Option 3 was my choice, which was a Uterine Artery Embolazation: requires NO surgery, but it is not an altogether easy option. I went to the leader in the field at UCLA. And it turned out to be a cheaper option for me and my insurance company. I am very happy with the results. Second opinions are a must! And honestly, although I eat and buy everything I can locally, I think LA or SF may be a better options for people needing 3rd opinions (folks with other health problems as I have.) Most doctors in SB are GREAT, but not often progressive (it is a sleepy town that way.) A few words too many today, I could write a book on this summer's experience. Please ask yourself a few questions before any non emergency surgery: could scar tissue be a bigger problem for me, do I have a history of cancer in my family and do I understand my options? Books and friends were a blessing for me in deciding.

    AFewWords (anonymous profile)
    August 22, 2008 at 3:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Mist
    Temperature:
    55.9°
    Wind:
    7 NE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Blue Green Guide 2008
    • Summer Camp Guide 2008
    • Wedding Guide 2008
    • SBIFF 2008 All Access
    • 2008 Election Coverage
    • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
    • Made in Santa Barbara
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Chamomile Café
    • Reprieve for Modoc Road Evictees
    • Which Canyon Will Burn Next?
    • Portland’s Rock Revivalists Head to Muddy Waters
    • Thanksgiving Turkey
    1. Saving the Riviera
    2. Obituary for Susan Lake
    3. School District’s Special Ed Director Quits
    4. Hannah-Beth Jackson Concedes to Tony Strickland
    5. UCSB’s Fall Dance Concert 2008
    6. From Black Friday to Blessed Friday
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.