With a November ballot packed with important races — from the local 3rd District Supervisor race to the presidential race, to water boards, city councils, State Senate and Assembly races — battle lines are being drawn. And Santa Barbara Democrats have found their headquarters for the battles: a newly christened, 6,000-square-foot building at 430 Chapala Street, which will be home to volunteer efforts for elections throughout the county.
Paul Wellman
Daraka Larimore-Hall addresses the crowd during the opening of the Democratic headquarters in Santa Barbara
A few hundred people packed the “Headquarters for Change” to enjoy drinks and snacks and to hear from some of the party’s choices in the biggest races this fall. Hannah-Beth Jackson, candidate for State Senate, started the show with an impassioned speech, followed by 3rd District Supervisor candidate Doreen Farr and then Representative Lois Capps, who is up for reelection. Also on hand were six out of seven Santa Barbara City Councilmembers, 1st Distric Supervisor Salud Carbajal, and many other faces well-known throughout the local Democratic party. Daraka Larimore-Hall, chair of the Democratic Party of Santa Barbara, said the unit was the “bitchin’-est headquarters in the history of Santa Barbara."
Paul Wellman
Tim Allison and Hannah-Beth Jackson at the grand opening of Santa Barbara's Democratic headquarters
The building will be campaign headquarters for Jackson and Assemblymember Pedro Nava, but volunteers based in the building will also be working on behalf of Capps, Farr, and others in their campaigns, in addition to working to promote the party’s positions on various ballot measures.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
Hmmm...I was expecting a dignified address. For the chair of a local political party to use profanity when opening a new county office--I'm disappointed. Not shocked, because I have low expectations from local Democrats.
matildajane (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2008 at 3:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Please, matildajane, update yourself.
You are about 4 decades past the time when the colloquialism "bitchin" came into being: I used it on many a Goleta area playground, back in the day.
From the Urban Dictionary:
#1. Bitchen, bitchin
A term meaning good ; amazing ; fantabulous
"Woah that cake looks totally bitchen."
#2. bitchen
really good
"that concert was BITCHEN, dude!"
#3. bitchen
1. Exceptionally good of its kind.
2. Of great quality.
3. Said when astonishes someone's fancy.
"That tomato soup is bitchen."
binky (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2008 at 4:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
We Democrats are so stoked and jazzed about our new bitchinest Headquarters for Change that we even describe it that way at our own website:
http://www.sbdems.org/
David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
August 12, 2008 at 9:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I understand when entertainers use the phrase--it's because they don't take themselves seriously. They aren't looking for dignity or respect.
For someone who is asking for my permission (read: vote) to be in charge of my government, I expect a lot more.
Colloquial language is just that -- colloquial. Not used in any formal way, and not to be taken seriously.
When Dems decide to be taken seriously, they will use standard English. Until then, this announcement sounds like kids yelping on the playground, with no relevance to the rest of us.
matildajane (anonymous profile)
August 12, 2008 at 10:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow, that is a huge brush with which you paint, matildajane.
It brings to mind the the great use of serious language as exemplified by the most republican of Republicans, Dick Cheney on the Senate floor to Sen. Patrick Leahy (D), "Go f**k yourself."
Now that's serious.(And may I add, in no way directed to anyone on this comment board.)
binky (anonymous profile)
August 12, 2008 at 12:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hi, binky,
Rude language doesn't belong in public, no matter who says it. Mr. Cheney was wrong, and as I recall from this item of ancient history, he was criticized soundly for that lapse in judgment.
The county Dem chair was also wrong. His lapse in judgment was more recent, and was one of the topics of this article.
You're right that people should be respectful in public and not use profanity. Democrats don't have the market cornered on rude language, but this recent quote was one more instance of "Was that really necessary?".
He could have used any of a long list of adjectives that would have engendered admiration in the audience:
cooool
splendid
palatial
magnificent
more than adequate, etc.
-all words that inspire, and don't contain profanity.
Thanks for your thoughtful response!
matildajane (anonymous profile)
August 13, 2008 at 12:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment