• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

E Is for Energy


Thursday, December 21, 2006
By Martha Sadler
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

An SBCC professor emeritus and former UCSB lecturer in physics, Professor Elwood Schapansky retired several years ago to be reborn as a glacier-hopping pilot, ferrying climbers and tourists to Mt. McKinley. But he is still a good and patient teacher.

Last Wednesday afternoon, by the heat of a wood-burning stove and the refracted light of numerous prisms, he sat and talked with Martha Sadler for almost two hours about Einstein, electrons, and why the sky is blue. And eventually, after some initial resistance, he gave up the secret of E=MC².

What follows is an edited transcript of that discussion. If energy is neither created nor destroyed, where does it come from?

I cannot answer that question. Either God created it, if you are a religious person, or — all I know is that it's existed from time immemorial. If you want to talk about just on earth, the sun is bombarding earth with millions of joules of electromagnetic energy every moment. We cannot create it, we can only find a way to use what is there.

I've heard it said that the universe is winding down. What does that mean?

That's the idea of entropy, which has to do with the conversion of energy from an ordered state into a disordered state. What that means to most scientists is that the usable energy is decreasing. It's easier just to concentrate on what's happening here on earth. Every time we go out and burn a gallon of gas, that gallon of gas was in a nice container and it was localized and readily usable, and once we’ve used it, where is it? It still exists. It's in the molecules of carbon dioxide and other gases that are floating around our universe — and somebody can still use those, but they're less usable to us. The gas is converted into kinetic energy which makes your engine hot, you spew out heat as you go down the road, and when you apply the brakes to stop the car the car all of its remaining kinetic energy is converted into heat.

I suppose that's why brake pads are fire resistant.

Yes, you have to have something that can get very hot and can dissipate the energy without burning up.

What is energy? Does E=MC² mean energy equals mass times the speed of light squared?

No, you're just taking one isolated little Einsteinian equation and making it significant, and that's way, way, way, way beyond where we are. We can define energy very simply: It is the ability to do work.

Is it measured in Joules? Yes, Joules or ergs.

Does each thing have an intrinsic amount of energy? Like that pillow on that couch, does it have a specific amount of energy?

Sure, I could throw that into the fire and the chemical energy of the bonds that keep that together will be converted into heat. Most of it will go up the chimney but some of it will make you warm and so, yeah, there's an intrinsic amount of energy there. Every atom in our universe has energy, some very difficult to get to and some easier to get to. In fact, there's such an immense amount of energy that's inaccessible because everything at the nuclear level — if we could somehow get the energy that's stored in the nucleus out of there, then we'd have —

A nuclear bomb!

Well, a bomb or a nuclear reactor. But it's not that easy, there are only certain atoms that have nuclei that we can easily get that energy out of there. It's there by the barrels full, but we just can't get it. You can't get the carbon atoms that most of that pillow is made of to engage in a nuclear reaction. You can get that kind of energy from thing like uranium and plutonium. Those atoms are unstable enough that they will split and give up their energy.

Do two things that weigh the same have the same amount of energy, I mean, if they're in the same position? No, they have the same amount of gravitational potential energy. They don't have the same amount of chemical or nuclear energy, just gravitational energy.

Oh. That's probably an important distinction.

There's no relationship. It's a completely different form of energy.

One hears talk about electrons changing energy levels. What does that mean?

That has to do with photons. A little bit earlier, my wife's crystals created a lot of colors in here, each of those colors that you saw has to do with electrons changing energy levels. Let me ask you something: What is your concept of an electron?

That model of an atom that used to sit in classrooms that looks kind of like a solar system.

Okay, yes, the classical concept is that electrons whiz around a stationary nucleus. The reality is that you cannot isolate an individual electron, you can only talk about where it is quantum mechanically. What that means is that you can't say where it is — you can say what the probability is of finding it in a certain place. Also, classically, an electron could have any degree of energy, and it could even fall into the nucleus like a satellite falling to earth. Well, they don't behave like that.

Is there another visual model that you could suggest? Like a rainbow, or storm, or something?

No, it becomes very abstract. So for practical purposes the planetary model is useful in visualizing, even though we realize it's not correct. It's what we have to rely upon due to our human frailty.

Is an electron a particle of matter?

Yes, it's has mass, so it’s a particle of matter.

Okay, is it true that the space between atomic particles is much, much, much, much, much, much larger than the particles themselves?

Right, just as the space between the earth and sun is larger than the objects themselves. The same is true at the atomic level.

And do the electrons orbit the nucleus?

It's still okay to think of a nucleus with electrons in orbit at certain distances. The electrons have different energies, and we can represent those energies as a hierarchy of orbits. In this scheme, an electron can be in this energy, or that energy, but it can't ever be in between. I'm kind of using a hybrid idea—I'm trying to simplify it—but let us imagine that there are certain allowed orbits, corresponding to certain energy levels. And that's very important, because let's say we have an electron that's up here in a high orbit because it has a lot of energy. It can only switch from this high energy orbit to a specific lower energy orbit. How does it get rid of that extra energy?

Heat?

No, in this particular case it's light. It gives off a burst of light called a photon, so every color that you see in a rainbow is really coming from electrons going from a high energy state to a lower energy state.

That is beautiful!

It is beautiful. And this is one of the fabulous things that Einstein did: One of Einstein's relationships is the relationship between the energy of the photon and its wavelength. We can imagine — and don't say that Schapansky said this is true, but we can imagine — that electrons are going to try to stay as close to the nucleus as possible, though they can't fall into the nucleus. So along comes another atom, which bangs into it, and gives it some energy, and all of a sudden the electron is in another orbit. But it can't be just any old orbit: If the amount of energy that came in isn't exactly right, it wouldn't go up to this higher level. Nor will it stay long in that high orbit. Just like if you let loose of a ball it's going to fall to earth, that excited electron is going drop down to its lowest allowable energy state. And it sheds that extra energy as a photon or a packet of light.

Speaking of photons, I was looking at the moon the other night, and I was bothered that I could see the light coming from the moon but I couldn't see the light going to the moon. Can you only see photons when they're coming straight at you?

In essence, yes.

I didn't know they were so directional. Yes, they are, they only go in a straight line. Except that, believe it or not, in relativity, Einstein was able to show that photons coming from the sun that don't hit the earth actually curve around the earth, because the photon has a mass equivalence, and as such it is attracted to the earth.

That's part of its crazy wave-or-particle riddle?

Exactly. So here's an even better question for you since you're talking about photons. Why is the sky blue?

Because it's reflecting the ocean?

No!

Okay, okay! Because something's releasing photons at the blue wavelength? Because some electrons are descending down from one energy level to another in blue packets?

That's kind of right, but where is that energy coming from?

From the sun? But the sun should be giving energy, driving the energy levels up, not down?

Yes, but the oxygen in the atmosphere has exactly the right energy structure so that a blue photon coming from the sun will be absorbed. Then the blue photon will be instantly reradiated. It has nothing to do with the ocean.

Why is it reradiated?

Well, because—remember, we said earlier that when it absorbs it the electron goes to a higher energy state—

But it can't stay there!

Right. It is excited but it wants to come back to its natural state. So it gives off this blue photon. But which way does it give it off? It gives it off any way it wants to. It's completely random. So if I look over there I see blue, because countless billions of oxygen atoms are spitting out blue light every which way so that some of it comes to my eye.

So why is the sunset orange?

Because the yellow light goes straight on through. The long wavelength, lower energy light is not absorbed. If the electron could absorb it, it would move the electron up to one of these forbidden energy bands, and that's not possible. So only the light that can move it from an allowable state to another allowable state is okay. In physic classes, we would call this scattering. The oxygen is scattering the blue light, and leaving the rest of it alone.

Do electrons ever die or disappear?

Yes, they can change from mass into pure energy. If an electron runs into a positron, they will be turned back into a photon.

Can you change pure energy into mass?

Say you have a very, very high-energy photon. It comes into contact with an atom and lo and behold, magically, two electrons are created.

And the gamma ray disappears? Yes. It's the reverse of the nuclear reaction. In a nuclear reaction mass is converted into heat and other forms of pure energy—light, potential energy, kinetic energy, etc. It has to be reversible, though there are not many examples of this. The best example of converting pure energy into mass is the creation of an electron and its partner, called a positron.

You know this? Absolutely. You can spontaneously have a gamma ray, which is a very very energetic X ray, moving through space and it vanishes and—poof—an electron and a positron come out. Now, this is the first time your E=MC² becomes meaningful. E is equal to MC² is the formula I use to calculate how much energy this photon needs in order to create the mass of an electron and a positron. When you first brought that up, that was so far removed from everyday energy, because that literally has to do with relativity and the mass-energy equivalent. It means here's energy, and there's mass, and a constant--which is the speed of light squared--relates them. If I want to create some mass, I'm going to have to have this much energy—I can calculate how much energy I have to have. If we're going to convert radiation energy, or light energy, into mass, then that's the formula.

So that's the energy the formula refers to, not just any old energy.

Right, it's not a useful formula unless you're trying to create mass. And that happens all the time. You go to any particle accelerator, and you're taking neutrons or protons or alpha particles and you're banging them into something, so all of this stuff comes out. And one of the things that comes out is high energy gamma radiation. You can see it happen. They put all these photographic films around and all at once, out in space, two electrons appear, one of them positive, one of them negative, and this is all in a magnetic field so one of them is circling one way, one of them is circling the other way, and you say, "My God! There are two electrons! Where did they come from?" Well, E is equal to MC squared. There was enough energy in that gamma ray to create exactly that amount of mass.

Thank you. I've wondered about that for a long time.

Keep up the conversation by leaving your comments below or emailing Martha Sadler.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

nice article... very interesting stuff... thank you for the article

joyce jerge
December 23, 2006 at 8:17 a.m.

Very insightful article!! What an amazing man!

steve
December 23, 2006 at 9:21 p.m.

That man that posted this wisdom has been sharing his knowledge with me for his whole life. It makes me extremely proud to see others take joy in his hard work and dedication. Speaking to adults or to children, he has an amazing ability to bring the complex into simplicitity.

Although his is an amazing professor, he is even more amazing as a father and a grandfather.

Sincerely,

Son.

Steve
December 23, 2006 at 9:25 p.m.

Great article about PRO. Shapansky. the surprising phenom is that Eleood retires from teaching in beautiful Santa Barbara and then continues to pursue his love of flying ,buys a place in Talkeetna Alaska and goes to work again with an air service flying in and around Mt. Denali.during summer , and I get to go king salmon fishing with him once in a while.

frank farr
December 26, 2006 at 12:27 p.m.

The most amazing thing about Elwood Schapansky is that he's a case of arrested development! He's 16, and will always be 16! Fun stuff!!!

Bob Saffold
December 27, 2006 at 6:34 p.m.

Ron:

Thanx for sending it! I’ve got a little ‘study group’ of three adults and one very smart kid. We read ‘Dancing Wu Li Masters’ and are working on a few others in an effort to get a handle on these matters. I can’t say I understand any of it very well but it certainly mind-expanding if not –blowing. Your buddy Elwood puts us all to shame in the easy and relaxed way in which he describes what is so complex to me that I’d find it virtually impossible to summarize.

Ed
January 4, 2007 at 12:21 p.m.

Elwood, I forwarded your energy interview to Dan. He forwarded it to his life-long friend, Roger Dittman, a physics prof at Fullerton College. Roger made a project out of a reply or shall we say critique. I think I uncorked pandora's box. If you're interested, download it and read as much as you wish to allocate the time. Personally, I'm going to take a withdraw and resume my nap. Hal

Q: If energy is neither created nor destroyed, where does it come from?

It is, of course, a leading question, but assuming the premise, the answer is obvious—It couldn’t come from anywhere since it presumably can’t be created. The principle of conservation of energy is like the 0th dimension addition to the principle of conservation of linear momentum. With four vectors [0 for time related, 1,2,3 for three dimensional space related] in the covariant [relativistically correct] formulation (special relativity, that is), conservation of energy becomes the 0th component of the Principle of Four Momentum. This is all theory, of course, but quite elegant theory. Its validity depends upon empiricism, as does all scientific theory.

Q: I've heard it said that the universe is winding down. What does that mean?
[Schapansky answered, in part: That's the idea of entropy, which has to do with the conversion of energy from an ordered state into a disordered state.]

Entropy is a macroscopic theory. Pair production and annihilation are time reversed processes on a microscopic level. Whether time reversibility exists on a microscopic level is still a matter of some controversy. The concept of entropy had an original thermodynamic definition [Heat transfer divided by the temperature at which the heat was transferred]. Thermodynamics, one of the most elegant theories in physics in the postulational Tisza formulation, has essentially been reduces to statistics. This too is theory—statistical theory. A Nobel-prize winning physicist from UCSB wrote a statistically-based textbook about thermodynamics in which one is to calculate how long it would take for a million or so monkeys, rapidly, but randomly typing, to produce a minor work of Shakespeare—many ages of the universe. It turns out.

What is energy? Does E=MC² mean energy equals mass times the speed of light squared?
[Schapansky answered, in part: We can define energy very simply: It is the ability to do work.]

This is very wrong. Work is the definition [dW = F dt] that connects Newtonian vector mechanics to the more sophisticated and powerful scalar mechanics. In the so-called “heat death” of the universe, all of the energy is still there, at the same temperature, so no work can be done. Negentropy is more closely related to the ability to do work. In thermodynamics, engines theoretically operate between two heat reservoirs. Heat Q is transferred from the hot reservoir at T(hot). Some of it goes to work W. The rest goes to the cold reservoir at T(cold). The efficiency of an engine is defined as W/Q, which is equal to [T(hot) – T(cold)]/T(hot) in an ideal “Carnot” engine, which is the most efficient possible. So if the reservoirs are all the same temperature {“heat death”], no work can be done.

Q: Is it measured in Joules?
[Schapansky answered:] Yes, Joules or ergs.

Or calories, or BTUs, etc., but Joules are the standard SI units.

One hears talk about electrons changing energy levels. What does that mean?
[Schapansky answered, in part: Classically, an electron could have any degree of energy, and it could even fall into the nucleus like a satellite falling to earth.]

This happens. It’s called “K-capture.

My concept of an atom is based on that model that . . . looks like a solar system. Is there another visual model that you could suggest?

I suggest a probability cloud of electrons.

Q: Is it true that the space between atomic particles is much, much, much, much, much, much larger than the particles themselves?
[Schapansky answered: Right, just as the space between the earth and sun is larger than the objects themselves.]

Actually, to date no dimensionality has been measured for electrons. As far as we know they are point particles. Classically, this raises all kinds of issues—infinite mass density, infinite charge density, anomalous magnetic moment and angular momentum. (How can a point charged particle have angular momentum or a magnetic moment?)

Q: Do electrons ever die or disappear?
[Schapansky answered: Yes, they can change from mass into pure energy. If an electron runs into a positron, they will be turned back into a photon.]

One example, the lowest energy example (1.02MeV threshhold), of annihilation, above.

Q: Can you change pure energy into mass?
[Schapansky answered: Say you have a very, very high-energy photon. It comes into contact with an atom and lo and behold, magically, two electrons are created. ]

More exactly, an alectron-antielectron (positron antimatter) pair. “Pair production.”

Q: And the gamma ray disappears?
[Schapansky answered: Absolutely. You can spontaneously have a gamma ray, which is a very very energetic X ray, moving through space and it vanishes and—poof—an electron and a positron come out.]

Not exactly, an x-ray and a gamma ray are both photons. Gamma rays are usually, but not always, more energetic than x-rays. This is just nomenclature, but gamma rays originate in the nucleus, x-rays in the atom.

roger
January 4, 2007 at 1:45 p.m.

WOW! A terrific discussion. I only wish I had a better grasp of the science. I've heard the words for years but have only a vague understanding of the concepts. My years as an X-ray technician helped, along with illustrating early nuclear accidents at the lab.
Thanks.

j
January 4, 2007 at 1:48 p.m.

Lois Rye forwards me some of Schapanky's e-mails. This is actually the first time I have ever understood even a section of physics, even though my IU professor gave me an "A"--I'm sure it was through frustration. Thank you, Elwood for an enlightning conversation. I can now explain a rainbow to my adult son, who asked when he was three why and how did God put colors in a rainbow. At that time, I simply told him I didn't know, but then he wanted one for Christmas, so Found a rainbow shower curtain and the accompanying accourtrements--it was the best i could do.

Anne Hanson

Anne Hanson
January 4, 2007 at 3:12 p.m.

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Scattered Clouds
Temperature:
82.0°
Wind:
5 SSW

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • Election 2008 Kickoff
  • Esau’s: It’s Not Just for Breakfast Anymore
  • Juarez’s Fate in Jurors’ Hands
  • Our 2008 Endorsements
  • k.d. lang Returns, Wearing Her Heart on Her Sleeve
  • World Series Now?
  1. Watch Her Strut
  2. The Ones Who
    Watch the Water
  3. Tangerine Falls
  4. Barney Buys a House
  5. Cats on Parade
  6. Cold Springs Trail—East Fork
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.